Home | Politics
I am publishing this article ahead of schedule as I got mugged two nights back, half an hour before a political insider could get a sneak preview. This happened in what should be the safest spot in Kuala Lumpur, a taxi stand near Bukit Aman, where the Royal Malaysian Police HQ is located. The cops were puzzled at how it could have happened and after the incident, this redacted piece looks like it has an added "relevance." By Mathew Maavak There are times when you just zip up because instincts tell you that something is dead wrong. In this cosmos of interconnectivity, the flap of a butterfly's wings in Beijing can stir up a vortex into which the media can be sucked in, and spat out, into the day after tomorrow. By then, it's too late and unwitting journalists would have clinched a game of geopolitics for free and a red ink for life. So, when the media began circulating stories of a Malaysian "Abu Ghraib," I knew... the Americans were in trouble. The Story During the last week of November, a 71-second video clip emerged. In it, a woman stripped nude, was forced to perform degrading ear squats in front of a female officer. That clip was captured on a mobile phone and relayed till an opposition Member of Parliament exposed the scandal to her colleagues. Somehow, "news" morphed from ethnic Chinese dailies and this version was accepted and relayed through the wires. The unlucky woman, as the story went, was a Chinese national in detention over some charge. Major news networks carried the story with emotion. Editorials supplemented it with past police brutality, the most conspicuous one being the black eye inflicted on former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim. Watching the video clip, any propaganda and psyops connoisseur would be cautious because: 1) Much of the clip revealed the woman's back. Her face was barely visible for a second or two. Identity uncertain. Beware! Write in very generic terms. 2) The video clip lasted 71 seconds. Cellphone video clips can last longer than that. A longer clip leads to a longer trail of clues. Again caution. 3) The female officer was issuing instructions in Malay. All Malaysians are taught English from year one. Despite the lack of proficiency here, one would expect the officer to use simple English words like "sit" and "stand" to a foreigner. 4) An angry China didn't produce or name that woman. The Malaysians and the media couldn't find her either but articles and outrage kept rolling out. Strange, isn't it? Remember the tearful clip of the widow of Chinese fighter pilot Wang Wei who went missing during the Hainan fiasco of April 2001? That's when I learnt the words bao qian and dao qian - from CNN's Rebecca McKinnon. 5) You have to pay me to learn the extra discrepancies. No more freebies. Points one to five were not observed, especially no 5. It was ripe for one mother of an agitprop. How Bizarre? A permanent government-in-denial owned up to the human rights abuse with gusto. They were not alone. The media, NGOs, political parties, blogs, and Chinese associations were all united. Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak wanted "stern action against the culprits." "This is a slap to our image." Image is very important here. After all, "losing face" is an Oriental term. Facts need image makeovers as well. Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi who was then at the Commonwealth Heads of Government (CHOGM) meeting in Malta, demanded an "immediate investigation" with "no cover-up." Now, I rarely read the local papers - especially when I worked for one - but this show of local unity was pretty much unprecedented to ignore. Something was fishy. Why now? Someone thought of tying the 71-second clip to Abu Ghraib and it became a byword. I have read Abu Ghraib's horrors and had written three or four articles on it. There were no human pyramids here, no electric prods, no hooded heads bunched together and no sadistic smiles from army personnel. If there is an Abu Ghraib in Malaysia, Opposition MPs or the mainstream media should just tell us. Anyway, "stern action" or some action was taken against the Abu Ghraib culprits. Brig Gen Janis Karpinski was demoted to a colonel. You think some action would be taken against a person of a similar constabulary rank here? "Stern action" is a clichéd metaphor for scapegoats and short memories. Perpetrators of the Malaysian haze faced just that - two words till next season. But the geopolitical scenario would change next season. Malaysia's deputy police chief Musa Hassan reinforced the Game Theory scenario. Such strip-search procedures, it seems, are used by the "United States and Australia" to ensure suspects aren't "concealing banned objects such as weapons and drugs." Really? Weapons? And why single out these two nations? Before we get to the game, weapons and drugs can indeed be concealed in the nude. If you are puzzled, prison warden Zuraida Ghazali provides the answer: "I once saw a cigarette lighter dropping out of a woman's private part." What was in that lighter? Enough morphine to make a flight viable? The Game This agitprop came a week before Home Minister Azmi Khalid's pre-arranged visit to China. The Home Minister is in charge of the local police. Quite a coincidence. His original diplomatic agenda was "immigration," a curious term to use unless one factors in the 50,000-odd illegal immigrants from China. Some segments of the mainstream media - in this dividing line - went out to prove otherwise, by interviewing immigration officers. So, did this episode force concessions? Ethnic Malays are suspicious of pro-China moves and an incident like this was convenient, especially after other Chinese nationals had claimed similar harassment. There was also a drop in "tourism" from China. Were the missing 50,000 taken into account? When the news broke out, Beijing was indignant and wanted Kuala Lumpur to sort out the mess. It was obliged. Neither party identified the woman. Traditionally, this region has been paying tribute to China. Commies can come and go, but tradition remains. Quite a coincidence that diplomatic fences would be mended during the 11th ASEAN Summit, which, ran alongside the inaugural East Asia Summit (Dec 12-14). China was the star participant; its glitter received an extra media sheen from this incident. Almost every report, commentary or photo had China on it. The United States was absent; Vladimir Putin was in. Summit chairman was the pro-China Badawi. ASEAN has gone beyond talk shops to become a forum for the pro-Beijing softening up process. The trick is to nudge the Americans out, dangle sweeteners for problematic nations, and eventually get China to be the power-broker in this region. The first step starts with media slurps over "China's high quality products...the new Economic Superpower...immense markets." Rupert Murdoch's minions do it best and you should really give the Times worldwide ranking of Far Eastern universities a closer scrutiny. Check out alumni/R&D quality and volume and you know something is missing. It stretches that far. As for China's "high quality products," they are repeated way too often. All my Made-in-China electronic products went bust too soon, while a deliberately picked Made-in-Hungary Siemens cellphone survived a thousand drops over three years, and I used it till two nights back. Now, Siemens cellphones no longer exist, going the same way as IBM PCs, to China. That's economic might from an immense market. The future though lies in the economics of R&D. Dutch giant Philips knew that for a long time. Traditionally, it has forfeited manufacturing for innovation, and electronic products that pass WTO rules may likely carry a Philips patent and royalty obligation. This region, however, is returning to its traditional sweatshop manufacturing role. In preparation for that, the media needs to be muzzled, in favor of the biggest player. Vietnamese journalists have been jailed before for raising questions on territorial concessions to China. There will be more, depicted in terms like "mutual prosperity." This may eventually include carving up the contested Spratlys for oil. More money will be rolled out to problematic nations and politicians. Pro-US Philippines will not like this one bit. The Indonesians may play a double game. The situation in Thailand and Indochina looks uncertain. There has been heavy investment there by ethnic Chinese businessmen. Informed Malaysians are getting alarmed at the spiraling rate of investments from Singapore. So between the Indian Ocean (Burma, pro-China) and the South China Sea (Philippines, pro-US), there is growing tension across opposite geographic spectrums. This scenario was predicted in Samuel Huntington's Clash of Civilizations. Ethnic Chinese overwhelmingly control the Southeast Asian economy, and they are finding it cost effective to move their industries to China. Malaysia cannot compete even in niche industries. In the sinecure state perfected by former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, one victim was national innovation. He has realized rather late that critics create critical minds and critical industries. The South Koreans are an example. In an ironic twist, the doctor wants a new prescription: Alternative online media. Too late. Our R&D/Innovation to GDP/PCI ratio is perhaps the most pathetic in the world. Uprooted Palestinians have consistently produced better scientists, journalists and even footballers (Malaysia lost one fateful game to them, just after the Israelis killed a key player). There is an ongoing campaign hyping up our biofuel industry, specifically the B5 blend which has a cost-effective component of 95 per cent petroleum diesel. In lieu of new ideas, and new industries, Kuala Lumpur will have to accommodate itself with Beijing. The media will have to produce a semblance of non-confrontational unanimity against two potential trouble-makers - the United States and Australia. It's difficult to take on the United States. Australia on the other hand can be arm-twisted, even from within by the likes of Rupert Murdoch. Badawi helped along at the summit.
"You are talking about a community of East Asians; I don't know how the Australians could regard themselves as East Asians. We are not talking about being a member of the community, we are talking about common interests."
Azmi said the group, sent there to clear the air over negative issues involving Chinese nationals, had had a successful mission. He said China, while agreeing that action needed to be taken against its citizens who broke laws here, also wanted those guilty of singling out Chinese citizens and abusing them to be punished.
"Among those baying for blood will be politicians, businessmen and members of the chattering classes who have been uncomfortable with the greater leeway given to the media since Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi became Prime Minister in October 2003. They will relish the opportunity to argue for the controls to be tightened. They will use this case to argue why a freer Press is bad for the country."
U.S. officials are not willing to send the Uighurs - Muslims who are seeking their own homeland on what is now part of northwestern China - to their native country for fear that they would be tortured or killed. "The Uighurs, through their lawyers, have argued that because they are not a threat they should be moved to more hospitable living conditions and have asked to be released to live in the Washington area."
Article Source: http://www.articledestination.com
Please Rate this Article 5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5
Not yet Rated
Search This Site
Top Authors Most Popular Articles Submission Guidelines Ezine Notifications Article RSS Feeds About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Powered by Article Dashboard